*Dialogue with Educators: *
*On
the occasion of Teachers Day*
Warm
greetings,
I recently came
across an interesting story.
One day, Padmanabha Guruji was
conducting what he called an “aspiration test” in his class. He asked
each student the same question: “What do you want to become?”
The usual answers came first: “I will
become a lawyer.”, “I will become an architect.”, “I will become a
mathematician.” Some answers were more unusual and caught everyone’s attention:
“I will become a locomotive driver.”, “I will build ships.” Then came answers that made the whole class
laugh: “I will become a magician.” “I will become a chicken merchant.”
It was now little Vanchi’s turn. He was
hoping that no one would guess the answer that he carried in his heart. When
his turn came, he answered with a cheerful face, as though his deepest
aspiration had already been fulfilled: “I will become a sādhu!”
The moment he said this; the classroom
burst into laughter. The teasing and ridicule continued for nearly five
minutes. Some students began imagining Vanchi dressed as an ascetic, chanting “Jai
Alakh Niranjan!” Others pictured him
as a little holy man sitting beside a sacred fire, his body smeared with ash.
Padmanabha Guruji laughed too. Yet he
took Vanchi’s answer seriously. He realised, however, that it did not quite
answer the question he had asked. He asked, “What do you mean by a sādhu?”
Vanchi did not have the courage to repeat
the explanation he had heard a few days earlier in a kīrtana. The
laughter and ridicule of his classmates had already unsettled him. He had
become nervous and withdrawn. So, he gave a brief answer: “A satpuruṣa—a
good and noble person.”
“That is correct!” Guruji reassured him.
“But I was asking what profession you would like to take up. Being a satpuruṣa
or a sādhu is not a profession, is it?”
Vanchi
realised what he had misunderstood. He replied, “I will study, and then I will
choose the profession that I feel is right for me. I do not know yet what that
will be.”
(Reference: This story is drawn from the account of the life and work of the revolutionary Vāñcīnātha Aiyar in Gopāl Godse’s book, Aparicitañcyā Krāntikathā.)
I would make it slightly more reflective
and teacher-oriented, with a smoother progression from career aspirations to
the deeper question of the person the child wishes to become.
In the classroom, we often ask students about their dreams. We try to understand their aspirations and learn about the goals they have set for themselves. But if a child in our classroom were to give an answer like Vanchi’s, how would we, as teachers, respond?
Today, both parents and teachers are keen
to understand children better. They want to know about their intelligence,
aptitude, abilities, interests and aspirations. This concern is understandable,
given the “social anxiety” surrounding children’s education, careers and future
security. We want to ensure that every child chooses the right path and has a
secure and successful future.
Yet, beneath all these concerns, there seems
to be a deeper and more fundamental expectation. Whenever we are asked about
someone in an interview or conversation, we often respond spontaneously, “He is
a good human being.” In the end, is this not what we all wish for our
children—that they grow up to become just a good human being?
But suppose, in our classroom, a student gives an answer like Vanchi’s: “I want to become a good human being,” or even, “I want to become a satpuruṣa.”
How would we respond?
Would we simply tell the student that
being a good human being or a satpuruṣa is not a profession? Or would we
pause and try to understand the aspiration behind those words?
If a student expresses such a
value-based aspiration, what more do we need to know about the child? What does
the student understand by being a “good human being”? What qualities does the
child wish to cultivate? What kind of person does the child aspire to become?
What are the child’s inner strengths, interests, abilities and values? What
gives direction and meaning to the child’s aspirations?
Perhaps, therefore, a teacher needs to
ask a question that goes beyond “What do you want to become?” The deeper
question is:
“Who do you want to become?”
This shift—from a profession or
achievement to the person one wishes to become—may open a much deeper
understanding of a child’s aspirations and of the true purpose of education.
What other kinds of aspirations might
students with aspirations like Vanchi’s want to nurture within themselves? Such
students may aspire to live a value-centred life. To understand the
direction of their personality and aspirations, we need to look beyond
intelligence, aptitude, interests and career choices, and explore the realm of human
values. A meaningful assessment of such aspirations would therefore need to
consider a person’s values, ethics, virtues and sense of social
responsibility—in other words, the direction in which their human values are
developing.
The qualities considered in such
an assessment might include: Truthfulness — standing by the truth in all
circumstances and speaking honestly, Integrity — being transparent and
consistent in one’s thoughts, work and conduct, Sense of duty — carrying out
entrusted responsibilities with sincerity and commitment, Compassion — sharing
in the suffering of others and extending a helping hand, Cooperation — working
with others as a team and making an effort to take everyone along, Discipline —
following rules, honouring commitments and being mindful of time, Humility —
remaining simple and respectful without allowing success to give rise to
arrogance, Altruism — going beyond self-interest and working for the welfare of
others and society, Good character — behaving with civility, refinement and
sound judgement, Courage — remaining steady in difficult situations and having
the courage to make right and ethical decisions. Many other qualities could be
added to such a list.
But can such values really be
measured through a test? More importantly, is there a need to measure them
at all?
And if such an assessment is
undertaken, who should it be for? Should it be designed to tell others about
the student? Or should it primarily be a self-assessment, enabling the
student to look within, recognise their own strengths and limitations, and
reflect on the values they wish to cultivate?
As teachers, we need to ask ourselves
an even deeper question. Beyond aspirations related to studies, examinations
and careers, do we really want students like Vanchi in our classrooms
today—students who aspire to become good human beings, or even satpuruṣas?
If we do, are we providing them with
the experiences that can help such aspirations take root and grow? What kinds of educational experiences can we
offer in our schools to nurture such life-centred and value-based
aspirations in students?
And, as ācāryas, what values
are we ourselves revealing to our students through our everyday conduct, our
actions and our way of thinking? Do our students see in us the very values that
we hope they will develop in themselves?
Perhaps this is something worth
reflecting upon as we approach Teachers’ Day.
Warm
regards,
Jnana
Prabodhini, Pune
Prashant
Divekar
September 5, 2026
*To
get updates on Dialogue with educators, subscribe*
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaB2KBu7T8bXMcsIKb3o
Comments
Post a Comment